Examples were clear and highlighted the biochemical aspects without a need address social or other issues. So the material might be there, but as it is currently put together, it would be difficult for instructors or students to use these links effectively.įrom what I can tell, the grammar is fine throughout the text.Īgain, from what I read, I didn't notice any insensitive or offensive parts. And as mentioned previously, the plethora of tables/figures can be overwhelming when they don't always line up with the discussion of them in the text.Ĭouldn't get the links to work-although it appears many of the links are "printed" after the end of entire book. This doesn't make it "bad", just no my personal preference. metabolism, breakdown of sugars, fats, amino acids, etc. Yes, the organization is pretty good, although I think the introduction of electron transport and electrochemistry should come after an understanding of WHERE these molecules are coming from, i.e. This is unfortunate as these links could be great for further exploration and follow up assignments. Overall the text could be broken up, but again, possibly due to formatting, many of the links do not work, interrupting the flow, On all the end of chapter sections, I couldn't get any of the links to work, with a message about "to be developed" or "coming soon". This hurts the clarity of the text while reading.Įach chapter sticks to a familiar layout and walks the student through the various topics in a coherent manner. As mentioned above, references to tables/figures are hard to follow and some tables/figures seem "stuck in" at random points. ![]() The text is easy to follow, avoids jargon for the most part (until it needs defining). The tables and figures are not always near the relevant text and often there are figures/tables that appear before the section in the text. ![]() the formatting, does make it difficult to follow at times. The way in which the material is presented, i.e. The material for the basics and background for biochemistry are unlikely to change, so in that sense they are relevant. Examples appear to be unbiased and give good everyday correlations to biochemistry ideas. ![]() The order in which the concepts are presented is different, but again still fairly complete.įrom what I could tell, the information is accurate. This isn't a negative, just an observation. The material covered is fairly similar to other biochemistry textbooks, but does lack some of the details of a more comprehensive biochemistry text (i.e. Reviewed by Jeffry Nichols, Associate Professor, Worcester State University on 6/1/21
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |